Looking at Landing Sites for the Mars Science Laboratory

From space, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter takes a closer look at four possible landing sites for NASAs next Mars rover.

Duration : 0:3:21


[youtube sfYK8r6tlrg]

This entry was posted in science websites and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Looking at Landing Sites for the Mars Science Laboratory

  1. pacificguitarist says:

    I’m not from JPL …
    I’m not from JPL but I think I have the answer. Spirit and Opportunity were built specifically as low cost rovers as part of a program at NASA to send cheap Orbiters/ rovers to other celestial bodies.

    The Mars Science Laboratory is not part of this program. To give you a cost break down, spirit and opporunity each cost a couple hundred million to make. The MSL on the other hand will end up costing a couple BILLION. Building a second of these may just be too expensive for NASA’s budget.

  2. TableWolfMusic says:

    Good point. Besides …
    Good point. Besides, the rover is gonna get stuck on a rock or something eventually (as happened recently). So it might aswell get stuck somewhere interesting.

    Speaking of getting stuck, cant they have some helium balloon or similar to inflate from a pod on the back of the rover and lift it out of being stuck?

    Seems a shame to waste that helium that got vented from the lander they dropped at the north pole. That’s if they use helium on the rovers.

    Its a hamfisted idea but an idea nonetheless.

  3. TableWolfMusic says:

    This video is also …
    This video is also on Nasa videogallery
    Final candidate landing sites and reasons are:

    North
    Mawrth Vallis -Diverse mineral signatures -Mixing of soils by impacts and water

    South
    Holden Crater -Indicates water flowed from valley into crater lake, overflowing, leaving layers

    Eberswalde Crater -Water obviously flowed out of highlands into crater

    Equator
    Gale Crater -Once filled with water Many minerals exist ie Sulplates Sediments Clay

    I hope it’s Gale. Once equator was warmer? Likelier life.

  4. Tanru2000 says:

    I’d like to see …
    I’d like to see some mountains in the pictures that come back from Mars. Viking, Sojourner, Spirit and Opportunity all have very ‘flat’ surroundings. I know it’s more safe for those probes to land in such areas… but some mountains on the horizons would be a nice change in the photos sent back from Mars.

  5. dotancohen says:

    With the hope that …
    With the hope that someone at JPL is reading:
    Is there any particular reason why only one rover is being sent this time? With much of the cost of the mission already paid for in designing the rover, would it not be economical to build two rovers like in the MER mission?

    Thanks!

  6. Eisenmond says:

    I am amazed that …
    I am amazed that the landing sites are so complex and consist of extreme terrains! Such a landing would be an extreme scientific milestone!

    Consider that Phoenix was concerned with large stones – this mission will be landing in shear cliff style terrains. Amazing! And Good Luck!

  7. mattforce7 says:

    amazing
    amazing

  8. paulaharris2 says:

    Very clear and …
    Very clear and informative. Thank you.

  9. grummeper says:

    Thanks!
    Thanks!

  10. tiapon says:

    gr8
    gr8